>>> >> technically yes, but you do not need many things to run the code: >> - class comments >> - method comments >> - any documentation in general >> > > And I don't have it at production because I don't have changes file here. > > >> yet you load them. so I wonder if it makes sense to even load tests >> separately? >> > > It make sense when you try to reduce production image size. And loading > only required packages (without tests) works well. Why change it?
I know that this scheme is in use, but why? why do I have to reduce the size of a production image? from how many to many megabytes? It might make sense for moose, but none of the other projects. Do you really care if the image is 35 instead of 25MB? To me this argument sounds invalid :/
