I would use
TextModelCore
TextModelExtensions
TextModelCore-Tests
No extra dash in the middle.
Stef
On May 21, 2013, at 10:24 PM, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2013/5/21 stephane ducasse <[email protected]>
>
> On May 21, 2013, at 9:00 AM, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 2013/5/20 stephane ducasse <[email protected]>
>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> New TxText version 0.8 is ready:
>>>
>>> - editor stuff extracted to separate packages TxText-Editor and
>>> TxTextTests-Editor
>>
>> may be you should call the second package TxTextEditor-Tests
>>
>> I just follow convention of other TxText packages: TxText-Model ->
>> TxTextTests-Model, TxText-Layout -> TxTextTests-Layout and etc.
>> Some times ago I suggest such repackaging and nobody was against it
>
> Still I think that the packages names are not good. I do not hitnk that
> having tests mixed with the package name is a good approach
> and we should clean all of them for 3.0
>
> So what the correct way (Pharo way) to name test packages?
> For example I have 'MyPackage-SubCat1-SubCat2'. What name for test package
> should be?
>
>
> Stef
>
>
>
>
>
