Hi Erwan and all, Just to make a few things clear about Roassal 3d vs SourceCity.
We are currently working on Roassal 3d, which intends to be a nice layer at the top of NBOpenGL and NBXLib to easily create 3d scenes with cubes, lights, camera, interactions, zooming, translucent coloring, clicking/rotating/translating individual elements and so on. Everything that is good for Roassal is equally good for 3D Scene. Having a city-like visualization will be one of our first objectives since (i) it is a compelling use of 3D and (ii) it is easy to implement (at least the bases). We started to work on a CityBuilder, to easily create cities from objects and provided metrics. Ideally, it would be great to have SourceCity based on our effort. Not now since we have just started Roassal 3D, but on some point we should merge (this is similar in the 2d World with Mondrian and EyeSee moving from plain Morphic to Roassal). Our objective is to offer a great 3d framework to make a truly flying SourceCity. Does this make sense to you? Cheers, Alexandre On Jul 4, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Erwan Douaille <douailleer...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/SourceCity/ > > done > > > 2013/7/4 Camillo Bruni <camillobr...@gmail.com> > > On 2013-07-04, at 15:35, Erwan Douaille <douailleer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I updated the ConfigurationOfSourceCity. > > > > Gofer new > > smalltalkhubUser: 'ErwanDouaille' project: 'SourceCity'; > > configuration; > > load. > > ConfigurationOfSourceCity loadBleedingEdge > > would it make sense to make a jenkins job for this? > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > Douaille Erwan <douaille.er...@gmail.com> -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
