> On 26 Jan 2015, at 07:44, Hernán Morales Durand <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I want to discuss case 14789
> (https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14789/Nautilus-assumes-a-class-always-understand-package
>
> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14789/Nautilus-assumes-a-class-always-understand-package>)
> because a class should be browseable even without a definition. Anonymous
> classes are still classes.
>
> If Nautilus project cannot deal with the whole Smalltalk power then it is
> poorly designed and I wonder what's the advantage over the old OmniBrowser...
>
It means pushing a lot of API down to Behaviour. Do we want that?
Marcus
