Hi Stef 2015-01-31 6:13 GMT-03:00 stepharo <steph...@free.fr>:
> Hernan > > I would really love that you think twice before pressing the button sent > mail. Else I will finish to put > you on my kill list and I will be sad but so far I see from you often > frustration. Could you try to be positive? > You will see as a state of mind this is so much more pleasant. > > I will reply to this by private e-mail. > There are many aspects of Nautilus that I do not like but there are even > more aspect about the old browser > and OB that I hate! And as you know doing is difficult. > You know I wrote several OB browsers so I know OB had problems. OB was not *that* bad. The old browser was. But I just spent too much energy on OB. > So what is the point. How many anonymous classes did I created over the > last five year: none. > We have different POV and use cases. > What do we do with class side? packages? > > Why do you expect that a tools supporting the Smalltalk metaclass model > should suport Anonymous classes? > Because tools should be flexible enough to support other similar artifacts (like anonymous classes) at least without too much modification. How we can evolve if tools are not adaptable? > BTW I'm the guy in Squeak that fixed long long long time ago Behavior new > new (So I know a bit on anonymous classes). > When I used anonymous classes > I did it to support instance based programming. So should I expect my hack > to work with normal browser? > > When I think about halting SystemWindow>>delete automatically I miss the instance-based behavior. I do not consider it a hack. Now Glamour could be a solution? It would support building tools for all the other experiments (MethodWrappers, Ghosts, Multi-Methods, Wide Classes, etc)? Now may be the anonymous classes you create should return a dummy package. > > I think that would be a good solution. > Stef > > Le 26/1/15 07:44, Hernán Morales Durand a écrit : > > I want to discuss case 14789 (https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/ >> cases/14789/Nautilus-assumes-a-class-always-understand-package) because >> a class should be browseable even without a definition. Anonymous classes >> are still classes. >> >> If Nautilus project cannot deal with the whole Smalltalk power then it is >> poorly designed and I wonder what's the advantage over the old >> OmniBrowser... >> >> Hernán >> >> > >
