Hernan
I would really love that you think twice before pressing the button sent
mail. Else I will finish to put
you on my kill list and I will be sad but so far I see from you often
frustration. Could you try to be positive?
You will see as a state of mind this is so much more pleasant.
There are many aspects of Nautilus that I do not like but there are even
more aspect about the old browser
and OB that I hate! And as you know doing is difficult.
So what is the point. How many anonymous classes did I created over the
last five year: none.
What do we do with class side? packages?
Why do you expect that a tools supporting the Smalltalk metaclass model
should suport Anonymous classes?
BTW I'm the guy in Squeak that fixed long long long time ago Behavior
new new (So I know a bit on anonymous classes).
When I used anonymous classes
I did it to support instance based programming. So should I expect my
hack to work with normal browser?
Now may be the anonymous classes you create should return a dummy package.
Stef
Le 26/1/15 07:44, Hernán Morales Durand a écrit :
I want to discuss case 14789
(https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14789/Nautilus-assumes-a-class-always-understand-package)
because a class should be browseable even without a definition.
Anonymous classes are still classes.
If Nautilus project cannot deal with the whole Smalltalk power then it
is poorly designed and I wonder what's the advantage over the old
OmniBrowser...
Hernán
