> On 26 Jan 2015, at 07:52, Hernán Morales Durand <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Marcus, I don't see it. > Why an UI tool defect should impact Behavior?
my problem is a bit that I have so much to do (there are 672 other open issues…) that I can’t even think about this, so I will ignore it for now. > > 2015-01-26 3:49 GMT-03:00 Marcus Denker <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > >> On 26 Jan 2015, at 07:44, Hernán Morales Durand <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I want to discuss case 14789 >> (https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14789/Nautilus-assumes-a-class-always-understand-package >> >> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14789/Nautilus-assumes-a-class-always-understand-package>) >> because a class should be browseable even without a definition. Anonymous >> classes are still classes. >> >> If Nautilus project cannot deal with the whole Smalltalk power then it is >> poorly designed and I wonder what's the advantage over the old OmniBrowser... >> > It means pushing a lot of API down to Behaviour. Do we want that? > > Marcus > >
