I will reply to this by private e-mail.
There are many aspects of Nautilus that I do not like but there
are even more aspect about the old browser
and OB that I hate! And as you know doing is difficult.
You know I wrote several OB browsers so I know OB had problems.
OB was not *that* bad. The old browser was.
But I just spent too much energy on OB.
:)
What do we do with class side? packages?
Why do you expect that a tools supporting the Smalltalk metaclass
model should suport Anonymous classes?
Because tools should be flexible enough to support other similar
artifacts (like anonymous classes) at least without too much
modification. How we can evolve if tools are not adaptable?
now classes belongs to a package so the class browser assume that your
class must belong to a package.
BTW I'm the guy in Squeak that fixed long long long time ago
Behavior new new (So I know a bit on anonymous classes).
When I used anonymous classes
I did it to support instance based programming. So should I expect
my hack to work with normal browser?
When I think about halting SystemWindow>>delete automatically I miss
the instance-based behavior.
I do not consider it a hack.
Now Glamour could be a solution? It would support building tools for
all the other experiments (MethodWrappers, Ghosts, Multi-Methods, Wide
Classes, etc)?
May be. :)
