> On 02 Sep 2015, at 12:32, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi guille > > there is not stress. I just wanted to let you know. > I was wondering if just subclassing DateAndTime would not be enough for now.
Yes, as far as I remember Timestamp was just an empy subclass. We could: -> add it back to Deprecated50 or maybe even to a “Compatibility” package -> Write a Quality Check rule. > I will go back to code with Pharo 40 > > stef > > Le 2/9/15 10:30, Guillermo Polito a écrit : >> If somebody can check it and fix it it would be good :). I've just started >> my new job and my evenings are busy looking for an apartment or staying in a >> hostel without a proper internet connection... >> >> If not, I think we can wait a bit. The first step should be enabling CI jobs >> for pharo5. Also, I do not think the intersection between 'people using >> garage opendbx' and 'people using pharo5' is that big to justify a rush. >> >> Guille >> >> El mié., 2 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 10:12 a. m., stepharo <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió: >> for your info... >> >> Garage-OpenDBX does not load on Pharo 50 because it uses Timestamp >> >> Stef >> >
