On 9/2/15, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 02 Sep 2015, at 12:32, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guille
>>
>> there is not stress. I just wanted to let you know.
>> I was wondering if just subclassing DateAndTime would not be enough for
>> now.
>
> Yes, as far as I remember Timestamp was just an empy subclass.
>
> We could:
>
> -> add it back to Deprecated50 or maybe even to a “Compatibility” package
+1
> -> Write a Quality Check rule.
>
>> I will go back to code with Pharo 40
>>
>> stef
>>
>> Le 2/9/15 10:30, Guillermo Polito a écrit :
>>> If somebody can check it and fix it it would be good :). I've just
>>> started my new job and my evenings are busy looking for an apartment or
>>> staying in a hostel without a proper internet connection...
>>>
>>> If not, I think we can wait a bit. The first step should be enabling CI
>>> jobs for pharo5. Also, I do not think the intersection between 'people
>>> using garage opendbx' and 'people using pharo5' is that big to justify a
>>> rush.
>>>
>>> Guille
>>>
>>> El mié., 2 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 10:12 a. m., stepharo
>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió:
>>> for your info...
>>>
>>> Garage-OpenDBX does not load on Pharo 50 because it uses Timestamp
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>
>
>
