We should update Garage :)
Stef
Le 2/9/15 13:35, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
But Timestamp was already removed completely from 4.0, why re-add it, even
deprecated ?
I am sure many external packages are already modified, I know I did it for mine.
On 02 Sep 2015, at 13:19, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
On 02 Sep 2015, at 12:32, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi guille
there is not stress. I just wanted to let you know.
I was wondering if just subclassing DateAndTime would not be enough for now.
Yes, as far as I remember Timestamp was just an empy subclass.
We could:
-> add it back to Deprecated50 or maybe even to a “Compatibility” package
-> Write a Quality Check rule.
I will go back to code with Pharo 40
stef
Le 2/9/15 10:30, Guillermo Polito a écrit :
If somebody can check it and fix it it would be good :). I've just started my
new job and my evenings are busy looking for an apartment or staying in a
hostel without a proper internet connection...
If not, I think we can wait a bit. The first step should be enabling CI jobs
for pharo5. Also, I do not think the intersection between 'people using garage
opendbx' and 'people using pharo5' is that big to justify a rush.
Guille
El mié., 2 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 10:12 a. m., stepharo <[email protected]>
escribió:
for your info...
Garage-OpenDBX does not load on Pharo 50 because it uses Timestamp
Stef
