> On 03 Sep 2015, at 06:01, H. Hirzel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 9/2/15, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: >> But Timestamp was already removed completely from 4.0, why re-add it, even >> deprecated ? > > Because it will be added in a compatibility layer package which is > only loaded by packages which need it. There might be other things in > the Pharo 5/4 compatibility package.
But still, if external packages do load that code, they will never have to change, and the class will remain in the image forever. It is like when you load certain Squeak packages that are 'ported' with compatibility layers to Pharo: they just add again all the methods that we tried to clean up. > --HH > >> I am sure many external packages are already modified, I know I did it for >> mine. > >>> On 02 Sep 2015, at 13:19, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 02 Sep 2015, at 12:32, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi guille >>>> >>>> there is not stress. I just wanted to let you know. >>>> I was wondering if just subclassing DateAndTime would not be enough for >>>> now. >>> >>> Yes, as far as I remember Timestamp was just an empy subclass. >>> >>> We could: >>> >>> -> add it back to Deprecated50 or maybe even to a “Compatibility” package >>> -> Write a Quality Check rule. >>> >>>> I will go back to code with Pharo 40 >>>> >>>> stef >>>> >>>> Le 2/9/15 10:30, Guillermo Polito a écrit : >>>>> If somebody can check it and fix it it would be good :). I've just >>>>> started my new job and my evenings are busy looking for an apartment or >>>>> staying in a hostel without a proper internet connection... >>>>> >>>>> If not, I think we can wait a bit. The first step should be enabling CI >>>>> jobs for pharo5. Also, I do not think the intersection between 'people >>>>> using garage opendbx' and 'people using pharo5' is that big to justify a >>>>> rush. >>>>> >>>>> Guille >>>>> >>>>> El mié., 2 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 10:12 a. m., stepharo >>>>> <[email protected]> escribió: >>>>> for your info... >>>>> >>>>> Garage-OpenDBX does not load on Pharo 50 because it uses Timestamp >>>>> >>>>> Stef >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >
