Yes!!!! marcus it would be a good idea.
Stef
Le 2/9/15 13:19, Marcus Denker a écrit :
On 02 Sep 2015, at 12:32, stepharo <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi guille
there is not stress. I just wanted to let you know.
I was wondering if just subclassing DateAndTime would not be enough
for now.
Yes, as far as I remember Timestamp was just an empy subclass.
We could:
-> add it back to Deprecated50 or maybe even to a “Compatibility” package
-> Write a Quality Check rule.
I will go back to code with Pharo 40
stef
Le 2/9/15 10:30, Guillermo Polito a écrit :
If somebody can check it and fix it it would be good :). I've just
started my new job and my evenings are busy looking for an apartment
or staying in a hostel without a proper internet connection...
If not, I think we can wait a bit. The first step should be enabling
CI jobs for pharo5. Also, I do not think the intersection between
'people using garage opendbx' and 'people using pharo5' is that big
to justify a rush.
Guille
El mié., 2 de sept. de 2015 a la(s) 10:12 a. m., stepharo
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió:
for your info...
Garage-OpenDBX does not load on Pharo 50 because it uses
Timestamp
Stef
