On 16 September 2016 at 15:35, Thierry Goubier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Could we have a Pillar-way of organizing comments so that, based on > sections, one could automatically find, from a book-like comment of the > package or the class, which section applies to a given method? I guess it's like any cross-referencing or indexing system… I'm guessing a purely automatic system would find irrelevant matches and miss related stuff, so it would need some human-added hints. But no one can reasonably go through the cross-product of docs and code, adding hints, so that would need to be crowdsourced and aggregated, a bit like the QA critiques. I'll leave this link to the Django docs: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.10/ I recently watched a talk from I think the Django lead who was explaining the different kinds of docs (tutorials, howtos, topic guides, and reference). Package/class/method comments would be reference doc, but would need to cross-ref with any other docs too… -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet
