> On 1 Dec 2016, at 08:06, Stephan Eggermont <step...@stack.nl> wrote: > > On 01/12/16 07:25, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> OK then. Why was this change no merged then ? >> Maybe it is a lot slower ? >> Is this VM available somewhere ? > > It was reverted, as that vm had more stability problems.
That is very general ;-) From a distance (not knowing anything about it), it seems that HDi support was considered not important. Else more people would work on it to fix its teething problems, no ? > Stephan > > >
