> On 4 Apr 2018, at 22:41, Nicolas Cellier <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Yes this is cool.
> I was wondering what if you try and modify the Meta-Link architecture itself,
> but my brain did not reach this second meta level...
>
for now all Links are ignored that are put in the MetaLink itself… but that was
more a bootstrap thing. Now that we added more fine-grained
control and better recession stopping, this can for sure be simplified.
But for “meta use” to put a knot in the brain, the next level is not that, but
instead “just” using links to install links at runtime or Links that
enable/disable
other links.
Marcus
