You guys are awesome!

Sent from my iPhone

> On 17 May 2018, at 11:01, Marcus Denker <> wrote:
>>> To me the fact that it uses a meta-link is purely an implementation 
>>> artefact, other than for breakpoints, watchpoints, where we annotate
>>> the AST with actions…
>> I only speak about management implementation. The way how registries of 
>> breakpoints and watchpoints are maintained and used by tools.
>> They all needs some kind of reification of meta information to allow users 
>> distinguish between them. 
>> Even if we will avoid all these caches/registries, we will still need 
>> mechanizm to detect that this given metalink is breakpoint and not 
>> watchpoint.
>> So I just want to have reusable mechanizm to manage all these kinds of meta 
>> information which is driven by metalinks.
>> To me "MethodCodeForTest" is just another kind of them. Tools will need to 
>> detect them in methods and to distinguish them from breakpoints and others.
> I will first do the infrastructure for the breakpoints/watchpoints, then we 
> see if it can be generalised.
>       Marcus

Reply via email to