You guys are awesome! Sent from my iPhone
> On 17 May 2018, at 11:01, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote: > >>> >>> To me the fact that it uses a meta-link is purely an implementation >>> artefact, other than for breakpoints, watchpoints, where we annotate >>> the AST with actions… >> >> I only speak about management implementation. The way how registries of >> breakpoints and watchpoints are maintained and used by tools. >> They all needs some kind of reification of meta information to allow users >> distinguish between them. >> Even if we will avoid all these caches/registries, we will still need >> mechanizm to detect that this given metalink is breakpoint and not >> watchpoint. >> >> So I just want to have reusable mechanizm to manage all these kinds of meta >> information which is driven by metalinks. >> To me "MethodCodeForTest" is just another kind of them. Tools will need to >> detect them in methods and to distinguish them from breakpoints and others. >> > I will first do the infrastructure for the breakpoints/watchpoints, then we > see if it can be generalised. > > Marcus >
