2009/3/4 Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]>:
>> Hi Pharaos (and Squeak-dev)! :)
>
> Hi goran
>
> are you planning to come finally to esug that we drink beer together?
> This year there will
> be a wine tasting social event :)
>
I hope i can join you :)

>> Alert to Pharaos: This is a cross post! (hehe)
>>
>> I just wanted to say (for whatever that is worth) that I like Pharo.
>> And
>> I like Squeak.org. And I like everyone doing stuff in/for/on
>> Squeak/Pharo/Smalltalk/Huemul whatever.
>>
>> I have Pharo on my disk. I just started playing in it for a toy
>> project
>> involving RB AST, RoelTyper etc.
>
> I got (not tested) a new visitor for RB AST (elf on squeaksource)
>
>> But I do all Gjallar work on 3.10.2/LPF right now, it takes time
>> moving
>> a large project to a different baseline, so Gjallar will probably be
>> on
>> 3.10.2 for a while. But nothing prevents us from testing out Pharo
>> later
>> on - whatever works the best I say. Gjallar is also 95% ported to GS
>> these days.
>
> sounds good.
>
>> I agree with Keith/Matthew that making good tools that can *span*
>> different forks/communities *must* be a good thing for us all to have.
>> All tools don't need to be spanning, but it doesn't hurt if *some*
>> are -
>> right?
>
> Exact. This is why I wrote a chapter on Installer for the new pharo
> book :)
>
>> I *also* agree with Pharo people that hey, Pharo is a fork - we/you
>> can
>> do whatever we/you like! And that is good - it's the strength of
>> Pharo.
>> If Pharo diverts too much in "base stuff" it might turn into a
>> weakness
>> - but we just don't know these things, it is still to be seen.
>
> Exact
>
>> It is all about balance, benefits, etc. And we don't need to get angry
>> with each other do we? :) Trust me, it just burns your energy!
>
> Exact this is why we did pharo :)
> to stop arguing but doing instead: but you know us :)
>
>> I have code that seems to be doing fine in Pharo - SocketStream
>> comes to
>> mind.
>
> :) the power of MIT :)
> In fact I do not know.
>
>> I know Pharo seem to be more inclined to use Universes than SM -
>> fine with me, no problem.
>>
>> I hope to move SM forward in some way, and I hope it can still be
>> loaded/used from within Pharo - even if it gets thrown out soon (I
>> think
>> I read something about that).
> Yes I read that too :)
>
>> I also intend to use both Pharo, Squeak or
>> whatever works best for my different tasks.
>
> Ok if you want to have some feedback on SM we can take that offline.
>
>> And finally I hope to revive DeltaStreams and make that work in
>> Pharo as
>> well as most other Squeak flavors.
>>
>> We are all Squeakers, right? :)
>>
>> regards, Göran
>>
>> PS. I am not sure why I am so damn cheerful,
>
> May be you were always like that ;) I do not know I was kind not that
> cheerful most of the
> time :)
>
>> perhaps it is the SURGE I
>> seem to feel in the Squeak community - so many things going on all
>> over
>> the place... ;)
>
> I do not know. We just started to move and to move at our pace
> with a shared vision built on our past experience and communication.
> Even our name and logo
> means what we want to build: a warm beam of light in dark tempest nights
> where any Smalltalker can find a place if he wants.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to