Adrian Lienhard wrote:
> Hi Göran,
> 
> I think this is a good and constructive way to look at Squeak/Pharo!
> 
> Re SqueakMap. We planned to remove SM from the core (doesn't need to  
> be part of an image that gets deployed), but make it loadable again  
> from the (not yet existing) universe. The only dependency I see is on  
> MC (MCSMCacheRepository), and a few overrides. Is there already a  
> loadable package for SM?

Well... yes... but I honestly don't recall the incantation! :) There is 
a small doit that sucks it down and installs it. No, not packaged as a 
simple MC - because it was meant to install in older Squeaks you know.

Will look into it.

regards, Göran


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to