Yes I agree. Stef
On May 29, 2009, at 12:02 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima wrote: > At Tue, 26 May 2009 10:09:58 -0600, > Brian Brown wrote: >> >>> Do you really think, he really cares about his former code >>> contribution to a system, which from the beginning was free and >>> open? >> >> So anytime you want to, you can just decide what someone else's >> intention for their code contribution was and do what you want? Each >> person owns his own code, and Pharo has to be careful and have actual >> permission to use the code they distribute. > > I have nothing important to add here. and like the idea of having > Pharo 1.0 clean and be careful. But in my humble opinion, yes, > *probably* Richard's intention was to make his code be free and open, > as he released it under the Squeak License, which is fairly liberal, > and he didn't complain when it is distributed in that way for a long > time. > > The sad part is that we as the developers are made to think that > being overly defensive is the right position... > > -- Yoshiki > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
