On Apr 12, 2010, at 10:18 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:

> Stef,
> I'm using Pharo 1.0 RC2 with Seaside 2.8.4 and all is fine but it took over 
> 15 seconds open a smalltalk debugger from a Seaside wallback. It was the 
> reason of my first mail.
> I tried with Squeak 4.1 RC4, to discard a network configuration problem at 
> operative system level, and i don't have the problem. It takes 1 second to 
> open the debugger.
> Then, Marcus ask to me if i had the same problem with 
> "PharoCore-1.1-11301-UNSTABLE", at that time I download it, installed Seaside 
> and try again. To Install Seaside took to me over 20 minutes but I had been 
> instaled it on Pharo 1.0 and was been fine. 

ok so with 1.1 this is working?
There were a **lot** of changes in 1.1. We will release shortly after 1.0 and 
much much faster :)

> Is it more clear now ?. Please, sorry for my poor English.

Don;t worry. write simple sentences and we will understand you.
> 
> Facu
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> This is really strange. Can you describe your setup? Do you have an 
> antivirus? And with Squeak you do not have that behavior?
> We are loading larger code than seaside in Pharo and we do not have this 
> problem.
> So I would really like to understand. Could you post your image somewhere?
> 
> Stef
> 
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:27 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
> 
> > Stef,
> > It took to me over 20 minutes to complete the Seaside 2.8 installation and 
> > when I interrupted it the debugger opened when the system was writting the 
> > pharoXXX.changes always but I couldn't check what is happening.
> >
> > I will check it again.
> >
> > Facu
> >
> > ps: I refered to pharoXXX.changes as "log" because of Visual Smalltalk 
> > where the "changes" are called changes.log, excuse me.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Stéphane Ducasse 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 12, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
> >
> > > Marcus,
> > > I can't install Seaside on Pharo 1.1(*) but then i'll try again at home.
> > >
> > > It isn't my point to compare Pharo to Squeak performance but I used 
> > > Squeak to test this particular situation.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Facu
> > >
> > > (*) it's very slow to write the log taking minutes to complete the 
> > > instalation
> >
> > which log?
> >
> > Stef
> >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Lukas,
> > > >> It happens on my machine with Windows/(Firefox-Chrome-IE 8) and Pharo.
> > > >>
> > > >> But I test it on the same machine with Squeak 4.1 RC4 and it go very 
> > > >> very fast
> > > >> to open de smalltalk debugger.
> > > >> Furthermore, Squeak 4.1 RC4 seem to be faster than Pharo, did you note 
> > > >> that too or it's only my sensations?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Did you check with Pharo 1.1?
> > > >
> > > >       
> > > > https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/26762/PharoCore-1.1-11301-UNSTABLE.1.zip
> > > >
> > > > In general, Squeak 4.1 should not be compared to Pharo 1.0 speed-wise, 
> > > > but Pharo 1.1
> > > >
> > >
> > > My theory for your bug is that it's this:
> > >
> > >        http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=860
> > >
> > > We added it to 1.1 on Nov. 01, 2009. Not to 1.0, because 1.0 was supposed 
> > > to be released
> > > "very soon".
> > >
> > >        Marcus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
> > > INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Facundo Vozzi
> > > InfOil S.A.
> > > Project Leader
> > > (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> > > [email protected]
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pharo-project mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Facundo Vozzi
> > InfOil S.A.
> > Project Leader
> > (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> > [email protected]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Facundo Vozzi
> InfOil S.A.
> Project Leader
> (+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
> [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to