On 30 November 2012 17:48, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2012, at 5:41 PM, ☈king <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 11/30/2012 02:15 AM, Goubier Thierry wrote: >>> It's underway. The infrastructure is moving to a better (unified) way of >>> specifying and handling shortcuts, and then vi and vim-keys and emacs >>> and others should become available. >> >> I have a radical question that I'd like to float. >> >> What about making vi keys not only possible, but the *default* for Pharo? >> > > I am sure the Emacs user will be violently against it. > > Another thing is that I personally think that one of the things that Smalltalk > did very early is to not have modes for editing… > > Are editing modes really something people want in 2012? > > (and no, I am not a vi user. I know one vi command and that is esc : q ! > to get out of there…) > i know a bit more. but that's my favorite :)
as to me, it is ok if pharo could have key bindings for anything, as long as it does not interfere with my workflow and does not forcing me to "do it right way". > Marcus -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
