Goubier Thierry wrote > the removal of the global, class-linked maps (it was rejected)... > This is the only step missing for your vim shortcuts to work.
Yes!!! That's exactly what was holding me up... From http://forum.world.st/Keymapping-Class-vs-Instance-Targets-tp4639863p4640220.html : Sean P. DeNigris wrote > > Guillermo Polito wrote >> - static shortcuts (per class) >> - dynamic category shortcuts ( you build a category and attach it to an >> instance) > The thing is that these two conflict. If I add a category to a class in > the "static shortcuts" (which I consider to be "default shortcuts" - I > think that's more useful), and then I want to remove that category for an > instance, I can't. > > What I want is: each instance gets its own copy of all its maps. If the > morph instance doesn't have any per-instance customizations, this can > point to the class defaults to save space (but I think this would be > premature optimization). However, as soon as the instance differs at all > from the class defaults, it /must/ have it's own local copy of all the > maps. I don't want to have to override each shortcut of a category > attached to the class. I want to detach the category /for just this > instance/. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Re-Vim-Keys-tp4657381p4657920.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
