Greg,
I'd be interested to know more about why an Amberola 1A would not sound equally
as good as the 1B for 4 min wax or blue amberols assuming the correct
reproducer is used, (the M for 4 min wax and the diamond A for blue amberols)?
Thanks,
Bruce
Bruce Johnson
Pod Valem II, 870
252 43 Pruhonice
Czech Republic
Tel: (CZ) + 420 602 362 473
Tel: (US) + 1 612 605 5242
________________________________
From: "phono-l-request at oldcrank.org" <phono-l-requ...@oldcrank.org>
To: phono-l at oldcrank.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 8:00:05 PM
Subject: Phono-L Digest, Vol 5, Issue 288
Send Phono-L mailing list submissions to
phono-l at oldcrank.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://oldcrank.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/phono-l
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
phono-l-request at oldcrank.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
phono-l-owner at oldcrank.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Phono-L digest..."
If you reply, please change your subject line and don't include this entire
digest in your message.Today's Topics:
1. Re: Loss To Phono Collector Community (Zonophone2006 at aol.com)
2. Re: Research: Amberolas 1A and 1B (Michael F. Khanchalian)
3. Re: Research: Amberolas 1A and 1B (Steven Medved)
4. Re: Research: Amberolas 1A and 1B (Greg Bogantz)
5. Re: Research: Amberolas 1A and 1B (Rich)
6. Re: Phono-L Digest, Vol 5, Issue 287 (RROCRREC at aol.com)
7. Dave Boruff (Mark Dawson)
8. Re: Research: Amberolas 1A and 1B (Steven Medved)
9. Re: Research: Amberolas 1A and 1B (Greg Bogantz)
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
