The light oil in WD-40 is fish oil. I agree, this stuff -- along with garbage 
'disposals' and 'duct' tape -- is one of the most mis-marketed, 
mis-recommended, and mis-used consumer items on the planet! Back when I was in 
facilities management, I cannot tell you how many locks I encountered that 
someone had 'lubricated' by spraying WD-40 into the keyway turning the dry 
powdered graphite lube into a cementitious mass that requires disassembly and 
cleaning of the lock.  When I found a can of 'WD-DooDoo' (as I like to call it) 
on a maintenance man's shelf, I would confiscate it. That stuff is 99% useless. 
 

> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:16:34 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Cleaning a phonograph. Wax removing.
> 
> 
> Hello Greg,
> 
> I cannot agree more.  I put a spring in a plastic bag with WD-40 for long 
> term storage and the spring rusted.  WD-40 does nothing to help removing old 
> grease and gasoline actually make it harder to remove.
> 
> Molybdenum-disulfide  performs the same function as graphite without the 
> abrasive qualities of the graphite.
> 
> Steve
> 
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:17:17 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Cleaning a phonograph. Wax removing.
> > 
> >     I wish people would stop recommending WD-40 as an all-purpose 
> > lubricant. 
> > It is particularly UNSUITABLE for lubricating fine mechanisms with small 
> > parts.  It was originally designed as a  waterproofing agent, hence, it's 
> > name "WD-40" refers to the fact that it is a "water displacement" product, 
> > this being the "40"th attempt.  It was invented in 1953, before which time 
> > plenty of other products were found quite suitable for lubrication 
> > purposes. 
> > The long-term ingredient is a VISCOUS oil that is carried by a light, 
> > highly 
> > volatile mineral oil carrier, similar to kerosene.  The kerosene acts as a 
> > penetrating agent which serves to carry the heavy oil into cracks and 
> > crevices, the better to waterproof the treated object.  So, yes, the 
> > kerosene performs as a penetrating oil for about 5 minutes.  Then the 
> > kerosene evaporates, and you're left with the sticky oil worked into the 
> > cracks and crannies.  See the description and ingredients here:
> > 
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WD-40
> > 
> > This description has fit my experience exactly.  After the carrier 
> > evaporates, you've got a sticky, tacky mess left on the object you're 
> > trying 
> > to "lubricate".  Bad choice for small gears and pinions.  I find that WD-40 
> > is useful primarily for exactly what it was originally intended - 
> > waterproofing.  And it functions as a lubricant for heavier mechanisms, 
> > although a proper oil or grease is far preferable.
> > 
> >     If you want a penetrating oil, use pure kerosene.  I use an automotive 
> > product that consists of a very light volatile carrier with suspended tiny 
> > graphite particles called "Part-Ease".  It's particularly good for stuck 
> > rusty parts.  Don't know if that brand is still available - the can I'm 
> > using is one I bought 30 years ago.  Works good on exhaust manifold bolts 
> > on 
> > cars and motorcycles.  If you want a proper lubricant for fine mechanisms 
> > like clocks and similar low-torque mechanisms, use a proper very light oil 
> > such as can be purchased from clock repair parts suppliers.  Proper light 
> > clock oil does not dry up or get tacky.  And it's available in various 
> > viscosities for light, medium, and moderately heavy torque applications. 
> > For most phonograph mechanisms, I find that ordinary 20 or 30 weight 
> > automotive motor oil works quite well.  For sliding surfaces such as the 
> > reproducer bearing bar surfaces on many Edison cylinder machines, I use a 
> > mixture of 30 weight oil and a PTFE (teflon) product such as "Slick 50". 
> > The PTFE provides long lasting surface penetration into the metal for 
> > superior reduction of sliding friction and stiction.  Actually, I like this 
> > oil-PTFE mixture so well that I now use if for all my medium-duty 
> > lubrication needs.  For very heavy torque applications such as the main 
> > bull 
> > gears of phonographs, an ordinary automotive grease is appropriate.  I use 
> > a 
> > molybdenum-disulfide based grease ("molly dum-dum" for you motorcycle 
> > wrenches out there) for most applications.  It doesn't dry out, channel, 
> > and 
> > get stiff like many lithium based greases.
> > 
> > Greg Bogantz
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Curt Angstman" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2010 8:36 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Cleaning a phonograph. Wax removing.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Gabriel,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > For basic motor cleaning, remove the motor from the machine and find a 
> > container large enough to fit it in. Fill the container with kerosene and 
> > let it soak for several days. Use a toothbrush to remove sludge from gears 
> > and small parts. Kerosene will not harm your motor and will actually 
> > lubricate it. When you are through, you need to re-grease the spring, if 
> > possible. Grease will continue to leak from the motor for awhile, since the 
> > kerosene dissolves it, so you will want to put a rag under it after it is 
> > re-installed. I also use WD 40 and spray lithium grease to re-lube the 
> > motor. WD 40 also will remove crud from the wood cabinet or painted 
> > surfaces 
> > without harming the finish - I use it on my BMW to remove tar, etc. It's a 
> > great product and has many uses, like removing sticker glue, tar and 
> > grease. 
> > It is also wonderful for re-energizing the paint on a horn. On black horns, 
> > I touch up scratches with a Sharpie marker and/or liquid gun bluing (gun 
> > bluing works great to "age" metal parts) and then clean the horn with WD 
> > 40. 
> > On painted or flowered horns, it cleans and deepens the colors. Neither 
> > kerosene or WD 40 will harm painted or nickel finished parts. WD 40 also 
> > restores and cleans 78 records and Amberol cylinders. Some people will 
> > disagree with that, but take a dirty, scratchy 78 record and try it - it 
> > will improve the sound and make it look better - and absolutely NO damage 
> > to 
> > the record - spray it on and wipe it off. I have used this method for over 
> > 30 years and have never had any damage to my records. It will not dissolve 
> > 78 rpm records or celluloid, but DO NOT use it on wax cylinders!!!
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I can't help with the parts, but what do you mean by "click-fitting" 
> > system. 
> > Are you talking about the latches on an early Edison?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hope this helps,
> > 
> > Curt
> > 
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:46:07 +0100
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [Phono-L] Cleaning a phonograph. Wax removing.
> > >
> > > I have just begun to clean my old and dirty Edison Spring Motor and it is 
> > > a very heavy work. Do any of you know what kind of product I can use to 
> > > solve the wax and grease that is on all the surfaces of the phonograph? I 
> > > don't want to damage the black paint nor the chrome finish of parts.
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > I also need some help for lacking parts. I need a speed regulating screw 
> > > knob and the lid lacks some metal parts to fit the phonograph base. If 
> > > any 
> > > of you can send me photos of how must be the complete "click-fitting" 
> > > system, I think I can make an idea.
> > >
> > > And, for the Bettinis, I need mica and metal foil diaphragms as well as 
> > > the recorder stylus that it lacks.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > Gabriel.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Phono-L mailing list
> > > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Phono-L mailing list
> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Phono-L mailing list
> > http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
>                                         
> _______________________________________________
> Phono-L mailing list
> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
                                          
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

Reply via email to