On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > guys to approve. So it would only be fair if you guys would wait for us,
>  > too. We often had this before. A non answer does not necessary mean we are
>  I completely agree and in fact there's no change that I have done in a
>  that I first didn't write on the list about and waited for the feedback.
>  And in fact, unlike some other people, I do not subscribe to "just
>  commit it" approach, I try to read and answer in substance - which makes
>  other people complain I write too much to the list.
>  Anyway, in this case I did wait. And now I am still ready to discuss it,
>  provided there will be real discussion - with arguments about positions,
>  etc. - and not just "this is insane, we don't like it, we are majority
>  so shut up". So if you want to start - please do.

I said that it is insane with explanations (see Jani's post). You
don't consider our explanations as valid, I'm not sure what else can
be done.

http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to