On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Hannes Magnusson
<hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 16:42, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Andrey Hristov <p...@hristov.com> wrote:
>>>> Tony created the FPM branch. Go revoke his karma!
>> Being serious two and half second would be helpful.
>> Tony's branch has been discussed and approved.
> No. I see the "headsup, new fpm branch _created_" but nothing before that.

There is no problem to create a branch to develop a new major feature,
sapi or large change. There is a a problem to commit to a stable
branch without any discussions and then simply decide that we need a
new release. I don't think it is hard to understand.

> Stop spreading FUD and trying to rule the project. There is nothing to see 
> here. Move along.

Not sure what you are trying to say here and does not really want to
know either. All I wish is that we finally get a clean and foreseeable
release cycles. And I try my best to make that happen, by working
together with many other developers.

Now I'm done with this topic, thanks for all the fish.


@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to