On 12.03.2010, at 14:52, Jani Taskinen wrote: > On 03/12/2010 03:43 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >> Because no decision has been made. Jani is creating facts without >> basis. Furthermore normal development is continuing on the branches >> we decided to have. Now there is suddenly a 5.4. The point in time >> when we branch off a new trunk shouldn't be Jani deciding this >> because he is pissed off because there are open OB bugs. > > Where the hell did you imagine that one? I'm not pissed at or about anything. > We can continue with the status quo for all I care, but don't start deleting > other people's work just because you don't like me.
Jani this has nothing to do with liking or not liking you. Actually I usually get along just fine with you. I still remember that you were the first core guy I ever had direct contact with and I also appreciate still how fast you fixed that IMAP bug I reported back then. But I did not appreciate the actions you took yesterday. I totally that current trunk is a stumbling block. But I cannot agree with you first committing something to 5_3 which the RM specifically said not to merge and then creating a branch without consent. Again there are commits going into 5_3 now which are for example not being merged in 5_4 atm and why should people do this? We can find a more sensible time point for the merge, more importantly we first need to make a decision on dropping current trunk into a branch or not. regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
