On 12.03.2010, at 14:52, Jani Taskinen wrote:

> On 03/12/2010 03:43 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>> Because no decision has been made. Jani is creating facts without
>> basis. Furthermore normal development is continuing on the branches
>> we decided to have. Now there is suddenly a 5.4. The point in time
>> when we branch off a new trunk shouldn't be Jani deciding this
>> because he is pissed off because there are open OB bugs.
> Where the hell did you imagine that one? I'm not pissed at or about anything. 
> We can continue with the status quo for all I care, but don't start deleting 
> other people's work just because you don't like me.

Jani this has nothing to do with liking or not liking you. Actually I usually 
get along just fine with you. I still remember that you were the first core guy 
I ever had direct contact with and I also appreciate still how fast you fixed 
that IMAP bug I reported back then. But I did not appreciate the actions you 
took yesterday. I totally that current trunk is a stumbling block. But I cannot 
agree with you first committing something to 5_3 which the RM specifically said 
not to merge and then creating a branch without consent. Again there are 
commits going into 5_3 now which are for example not being merged in 5_4 atm 
and why should people do this? We can find a more sensible time point for the 
merge, more importantly we first need to make a decision on dropping current 
trunk into a branch or not.

Lukas Kahwe Smith

PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to