At 18:13 15-08-01, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> > like. That's why the situation wouldn't change radically if/when the
> > engine license changes, much like it wasn't any different *before* the
> > engine license was even introduced, in the PHP 3.0 days. Having
> regulators
> > over the 'kernel' of the project is certainly not very unique to the PHP,
> > and had a significant role in bringing PHP to where it is today, and not
> > where Perl is today, for example.
>
>You always compare PHP to Perl. How about Python? It's a well designed
>language that's pretty open for development.. Look at their PEPs system.
And you always compare to Python :) I try to compare apples and apples. I
don't see Python as an equivalent of PHP, whereas I do see Perl as
something that had to potential to be a good thing, and blew it. There are
also many other, non-language examples, of opensource projects that work in
the same way.
Zeev
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
