Hello,

Lukas Smith wrote:
> 
> Well all of these new w3c goodies are still in development but yes there
> are "final" specs similar to those 0.6 stable open source releases that
> tons of people use in production

I think that you should see draft versions as HTML draft version. HTML
was already useful on version 2. I would say that SOAP 1.2 is comparable
to HTML 4, I mean what you add now to it is not vital to make good use
of it for Web services.


> 
> SOAP 1.2 was released less than 30 days ago iirc

No, you are looking at restructure of the document. The original 1.2
release was in July:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-soap12-20010709/


> And tons of people will use SOAP now

Yes, SOAP 1.1 is already useful as it is. SOAP 1.2 just added a few
non-vital stuff like large objects (attachment files) and I think also
some support for logging and authentication.


 
> But I think we have pitched the need for SOAP enough now :-)

There have been plenty of PHP Classes that provide SOAP support.

But some nice things have been added to some Microsoft and Borland
languages like the built-in ability to call a Web service just by
providing a WDSL URL and passing the necessary arguments. This is one
thing that can be done in PHP as nicely with support built-in the
language. That is the issue of this discussion.

Regards,
Manuel Lemos

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to