Zeev Suraski wrote: > I did not choose to raise the issue at this time, but I agree > completely with the opinion that it's a bad thing; It is my fault that > I haven't raised it a few months ago when I noticed this change, but as > you might have noticed, I wasn't involved at php-dev back then.
I did not mean to offend you. > Not sure what AFAICS translates to (lost you in the last 'S' in there) as far as I can see > But either way, the fact that it was changed months ago is meaningless. I agree. What about installing the sapi/cli binary as "php" when a SAPI apart from sapi/cgi is chosen? Clearly someone who, let's say, builds his or her PHP --with-apxs has no need for a CGI binary. Or do I miss something? -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://wishlist.sebastian-bergmann.de/ -- PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
