> James,
>
> I too have used various WYSIWYG html coders, and most of the time, I found
> my self hampered by application limitations. It is a fair way to study
code
> generated...but that method of learning can be dangerous as well. I also
> find I have quicker response/fixes to bugs in handcode.
>
> Now I exclusively use EditPlus2 - it's worth every dollar I paid for it,
and
> in my opinion, has helped me gain customers - once they watched me script
> and parse code with it. It is good to see others appreciate the
simplicity
> and power of Edit+. I like it due to the fact it is not limited to HTML
and
> there is alot of user support templates, auto-completion, etc available.
> Working with HTML, ASP, C, VBScript, Java, PHP, mySQL, and just plain old
> text files, is a real pleasure with this hand-coding product.
I'd like to take a look at EditPlus2. Got a link?
What I'd like an editor to do for me is help out with how the page looks.
One I set up a page that looks half-way decent - even if I use stock
templates or style sheets - I can always plop the code in later by hand and
that's no biggie. It's just that initial setting up of tables and stuff that
is kind of tedious and I want to get away from that so I can concentrate on
the code.
Yours,
Murph
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
