So sprach »Don Read« am 2001-07-24 um 13:56:51 -0500 :
> Folks whack at Sendmail for its past security sins (old news) + complex
> (& near impossible to master) .cf configuration. But I know i spent more hours
> setting up my first UUCP box then i ever did on sendmail.cf ...
> 
> Once setup by a competent admin, Sendmail can hold its own against all but
> the heavily customized MTAs.
> 
> > There are better solutions which also have additional features.
> 
> ~ s/ better / other /    
> 
> > Handling all those bounces manually will be a mess.
> > 
> 
> No matter which MTA you use.

Yep, exactly.  This was not intended to be a flame against sendmail.  I
simply used sendmail as an example for any MTA, except those highly
specialized ones.  It also might be a viable idea to outsource something
like this.  It's often cheaper and saves you the hastle.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
How to quote:   http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage:       http://www.digitalprojects.com   |   http://www.iso-top.de
   iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
                Uptime: 1 day 19 hours 45 minutes

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to