On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Lester Caine <[email protected]> wrote: > TygerGilbert at USAWebAdv dot com wrote: >> >> cmbecker69@, IMHO it doesn't matter what browser a developer uses to >> browse the web. It's the users who matter for ANY website, and since there >> is still a large number of users who still prefer IE-8, a site shouldn't >> break for them. > > While Microsoft may think that they can force everybody currently using XP > to buy a new copy of windows, that is an expense that is simply not > reasonable to expect, so blocking XP from loading a later version of IE > simply compounds the problem? OK most people will be using a newer free > browser in place of IE anyway, but only last week I had to help 'uninstall' > IE9 from a machine as the on-line parts service that it was accessing > stopped working. OK the site needs updating, but if the resource is not > available to carry out the work .... > Heck - I'm still running W2k on systems as the cost of replacing some > software makes upgrading an impossibility. > > php.ne used to be a good example of how sites should work, the current > disjointed mess is certainly not an example of good practice! >
Hello Lester Caine Thank god you read that report. I totally forgot you have a Windows machine and eager to contribute to the project. Could you do me the favor of reproducing the issue on your system and suggest a fix? We have no other sufficiently skilled contributors on Windows that could do this, so your help is greatly appreciated ! -Hannes -- PHP Webmaster List Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
