On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Hannes Magnusson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Lester Caine <[email protected]> wrote: >> TygerGilbert at USAWebAdv dot com wrote: >>> >>> cmbecker69@, IMHO it doesn't matter what browser a developer uses to >>> browse the web. It's the users who matter for ANY website, and since there >>> is still a large number of users who still prefer IE-8, a site shouldn't >>> break for them. >> >> While Microsoft may think that they can force everybody currently using XP >> to buy a new copy of windows, that is an expense that is simply not >> reasonable to expect, so blocking XP from loading a later version of IE >> simply compounds the problem? OK most people will be using a newer free >> browser in place of IE anyway, but only last week I had to help 'uninstall' >> IE9 from a machine as the on-line parts service that it was accessing >> stopped working. OK the site needs updating, but if the resource is not >> available to carry out the work .... >> Heck - I'm still running W2k on systems as the cost of replacing some >> software makes upgrading an impossibility. >> >> php.ne used to be a good example of how sites should work, the current >> disjointed mess is certainly not an example of good practice! >> > > > Hello Lester Caine > > Thank god you read that report. I totally forgot you have a Windows > machine and eager to contribute to the project. > > Could you do me the favor of reproducing the issue on your system and > suggest a fix? > > We have no other sufficiently skilled contributors on Windows that > could do this, so your help is greatly appreciated !
Hello Lester How is it going? Have you had time to work on this yet? -Hannes -- PHP Webmaster List Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
