Colin, if you please forwadrd this e-mail to [email protected] using the e-mail template here:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS#E-mail_template_for_release_of_rights_to_a_file You choose one of this free license: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Well-known_licenses PS: I update the page of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PHP-logo.svg with information i receive in this e-mail e link share with me. Thank you! :) Webysther Em sáb, 23 de abr de 2016 às 17:44, Webysther Nunes <[email protected]> escreveu: > Another thing, the use of this file hade no problem. The problem is the > lack of lot of information, like author, license, serialization in zoom > because is SVG converted from EPS. > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PHP-logo.svg > > I wait fix categories, information, wikidata link, another page of refuse > use this version (english version), probaly because serialization and etc. > > When the logo was created, approximately? > > Webysther > > Em sáb, 23 de abr de 2016 às 15:21, Webysther Nunes <[email protected]> > escreveu: > >> I'm so happy to read your answer made me very proud about regarding your >> attitude! :) >> >> After your e-mail there is no problem, in the end, my fear is in relation >> to the part that makes >> it clear that commercial use is restricted, which does not determine how >> restricted is. >> I will try to be clear in the words of the help guide for us volunteers. >> >> In a nutshell, it is very problematic restricted material we use, mainly >> for legal reasons, >> and I do not want (like no other volunteer), harm the project. >> >> Currently the logo appears to be cc-by-nc judging by what is written on >> the site, I would >> like to ask just a PR to place a valid license such as cc-by-sa. That way >> you do not lose >> the copyright, but allows the use of free projects, such as Wikimedia. >> >> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing >> >> "Some examples of licensing statuses commonly found on the Internet, but >> forbidden on Commons, include: >> >> - Creative Commons Non-Commercial Only (-NC) licenses >> - Creative Commons No-Derivatives (-ND) licenses >> - Unlicensed material only usable under *fair use*, *fair dealing*, >> or other similar legal exceptions (see below for the reasons >> >> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Material_under_the_fair_use_clause_is_not_allowed_on_Commons> >> ) >> >> Non-permitted licenses may *only* be used on Commons if the work is >> multi-licensed under at least one permitted license." >> >> But because of your previous email, I can send to the email box of >> Wikimedia and put it in terms >> of text and shape as simple design, as described in a section of the same >> link: >> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing#Simple_design >> >> Before taking any action over more than 100 pages in Wikipedia that uses >> the logo, wanted >> to know if the PR will occur, I can wait, if applicable. >> >> Lot of Thank you! The community were very proud of the gesture! >> >> Webysther >> >> Em sáb, 23 de abr de 2016 às 12:28, Colin Viebrock <[email protected]> >> escreveu: >> >>> Hey all. I actually am still around, just not active in the >>> php-webmaster group. :) >>> >>> A few things that I’ll point out: >>> >>> 1) The image currently displayed at >>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PHP_Logo.png is most definitely >>> not the PHP logo. This one >>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PHP-logo.svg is the official >>> one, but it’s an earlier version (before the spacing between the “h” and >>> second “p” was tweaked). >>> >>> 2) Looking again, the EPS file at http://php.net/download-logos.php is >>> also the older version. I can dig up the correct one and make a PR request >>> to put it on php.net. I can make a SVG version as well and, if the >>> current webmaster team approves, I think we could remove all the alternate >>> formats on that page … i.e. the “powered by” badges, file icon files, GIFs >>> and TIFs. An SVG, a large PNG and and JPG should be enough for anyone. >>> >>> 3) I have never “legally” transferred trademark, copyright, or ownership >>> in the logo to the PHP Group (as I have with the Open Source Initiative >>> logo I also created). I’m happy to do so, and can even use the OSI letter >>> their lawyers drafted as a template. >>> >>> 4) I’ve always operated under the assumption that usage of the PHP logo >>> is explained (in plain-English terms) on the website: >>> - if you want to make money from putting the logo on merchandise, >>> contact [email protected] >>> - for any other use, you can use it as you wish as long as you aren’t >>> suggesting that the PHP group isn’t endorsing your product/service, etc. >>> >>> I’m happy to discuss any of this further, but honestly .. if Wikimedia >>> wants to use the official logo (the SVG from the second link above), I >>> don’t see what the issue is. >>> >>> - Colin >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Apr 23, 2016, at 2:38 AM, Hannes Magnusson < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I don't know what that means. >>> >>> What exactly are you proposing? >>> I guess you can talk to Levi regarding that svg, but he has no claim >>> on the logo, and Colin hasn't been around for well over a decade. >>> >>> I imagine legally we need him to state that he forfeits any claims on >>> the logo and gives it to the PHP project. He actually has very >>> formally explicitly claimed otherwise, per his statements in commit >>> logs, website notes and elePHPant adventures. >>> He might even have a case to sue the PHP project itself for bundling >>> the logo as I can't find any records of him expressively allowing us >>> doing so, even though he commit some of the easter eggs himself. >>> >>> So what exactly are you looking for? Trying to stir shit up? Playing >>> pretend lawyers? >>> What is the end goal here? >>> >>> -Hannes >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Webysther Nunes <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> OK. I made the change today in Wikipedia. :) >>> >>> Is possible in future submit a PR to make this better? Color information, >>> formats, license and etc? >>> >>> >>> Em qui, 21 de abr de 2016 02:27, Hannes Magnusson >>> <[email protected]> escreveu: >>> >>> >>> The logo isn't licensed under any CC license. >>> As I linked above, the license text hasn't changed since it was >>> created, 15 years ago: >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/php/web-php/commit/6afea913d6600dec355564b59d27990fa230fc97 >>> (Colin Viebrock is the original author). >>> >>> >>> As long as you aren't profiting off the logo, or intentionally making >>> it look like the PHP project is involved with whatever project/product >>> it is used to, the use is fine. >>> >>> For commercial things, its complicated. Lots of people sell >>> merchandise with the php logo, and the logos@ alias was removed >>> ~decade ago. >>> >>> >>> -Hannes >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Webysther Nunes <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> We can use a SVG and say that it is geometric information but states >>> that >>> may be under copyright. My concern is to add a logo and need to remove >>> all >>> if someone claim the copyright, for example, if the logo was on a page >>> on >>> php.net as CC-BY-SA could put the URL as a source and use safely. My >>> fear is >>> to not bring harm to anyone. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Webysther Nunes >>> >>> >>> Em qua, 20 de abr de 2016 22:44, Hannes Magnusson >>> <[email protected]> escreveu: >>> >>> >>> http://php.net/download-logos.php >>> >>> Logo license wasn't a thing when it was created, so it has a "custom >>> license". >>> I can't imagine a way wikipedia could be breaking that license as >>> mentioned on the above page. >>> >>> If you can describe in a sentence what you are worried about I can >>> give you a definitive yes/no if that helps. >>> >>> -Hannes >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Webysther Nunes <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Great, we use this one with possible restrictions. You know who >>> create >>> the >>> first one logo? >>> >>> If you do not know, we can do something else. If a group leader can >>> release >>> as creative commons through an email that I can provide, you can >>> distribute >>> more widely the use of the logo only. I can provide more information >>> about >>> how this type of license, just let me know if you need to. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Webs >>> >>> Em ter, 19 de abr de 2016 19:47, Levi Morrison >>> <[email protected]> >>> escreveu: >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Webysther Nunes >>> <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I volunteer in Wikipedia and realized I do not have a logo PHP SVG >>> and >>> >>> also >>> >>> no license to use, I wonder if someone could help us to provide >>> the >>> logo >>> >>> in >>> >>> SVG and a license for unrestricted use. >>> >>> Category on Wikimedia >>> >>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:PHP_icons (is possible >>> we >>> create a new and better one) >>> >>> Mostly used logos: >>> >>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PHP-logo.svg >>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PHP_Logo.png >>> >>> Not good enough, about information, license and author. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Webs >>> https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio:Webysther >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Webysther Nunes* >>> >>> >>> >>> The logo used on the website is available in SVG format: >>> http://php.net/images/logos/php-logo.svg >>> >>> But I am not entirely sure on the license for it. While I authored >>> that SVG I really only took what was on the website and turned it >>> into >>> SVG, so I'm not sure who the "creative mind" is or what the >>> licensing/copyright restrictions are. >>> >>> -- >>> *Webysther Nunes* >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Webysther Nunes >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Webysther Nunes >>> >>> >>> -- >> *Webysther Nunes* >> > -- > *Webysther Nunes* > -- *Webysther Nunes*
