No worries, thanks for the update! Em qua, 1 de jun de 2016 11:30, Colin Viebrock <[email protected]> escreveu:
> Hi, > > Sorry this dropped off my radar. I’ve just fired a quick message to > Rasmus to make sure he doesn’t have any issues. If not, I’ll send that > email to Wikimedia confirming the logo is licensed under the Creative > Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. > > - Colin > > > > > On May 31, 2016, at 9:57 PM, Webysther Nunes <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Any news? > If there is anything that I can help. > > Regards, > > Webysther > > Em dom, 24 de abr de 2016 às 13:04, Hannes Magnusson < > [email protected]> escreveu: > >> Nice to hear from you! >> >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Colin Viebrock <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hey all. I actually am still around, just not active in the >> php-webmaster >> > group. :) >> > >> > A few things that I’ll point out: >> > >> > 1) The image currently displayed at >> > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PHP_Logo.png is most >> definitely not >> > the PHP logo. This one >> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PHP-logo.svg >> > is the official one, but it’s an earlier version (before the spacing >> between >> > the “h” and second “p” was tweaked). >> > >> > 2) Looking again, the EPS file at http://php.net/download-logos.php is >> also >> > the older version. I can dig up the correct one and make a PR request >> to >> > put it on php.net. I can make a SVG version as well and, if the >> current >> > webmaster team approves, I think we could remove all the alternate >> formats >> > on that page … i.e. the “powered by” badges, file icon files, GIFs and >> TIFs. >> > An SVG, a large PNG and and JPG should be enough for anyone. >> > >> >> >> That would be great! >> I think the powered by pngs are still fun, for historical reference at >> least. >> Same applies to couple of the icons. >> >> >> >> > 3) I have never “legally” transferred trademark, copyright, or >> ownership in >> > the logo to the PHP Group (as I have with the Open Source Initiative >> logo I >> > also created). I’m happy to do so, and can even use the OSI letter >> their >> > lawyers drafted as a template. >> >> I think that would be awesome :) >> >> >> > 4) I’ve always operated under the assumption that usage of the PHP logo >> is >> > explained (in plain-English terms) on the website: >> > - if you want to make money from putting the logo on merchandise, >> contact >> > [email protected] >> > - for any other use, you can use it as you wish as long as you aren’t >> > suggesting that the PHP group isn’t endorsing your product/service, etc. >> >> >> I think the only problem with this is that its understandable for >> case-by-case use, but not for a website, like wikipedia, which would >> prefer to put the logo into one of the license bins. Its far easier to >> say "all logos on this website are licensed under blablabla" then it >> is to hunt for all grammatical differences. >> >> As for the merchandise clause, it isn't realistic. We've never gone >> after any of the merchants, and I don't think any of them ever asked. >> The previous email that was listed, [email protected] didn't even work for >> the longest time :) >> >> This has worked for about 20years now, so I think its fine though :] >> >> -Hannes >> > -- > *Webysther Nunes* > > > -- *Webysther Nunes*
