>> Yes, I agree with your various comments. In all cases, the >> modifications would have been carried out by others by the time. > > That would have been great if it has been done by the translators >> themselves. But this commit (for example) proves that there are still >> some efforts to be made : >> http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.doc&article=969355259 > > I am unable to understand what you are talking about in these > sentences.
I was talking about adding the PHP tags in the examples. The commit I've pointed out was made a few time before mine. As you may notice, there's no PHP tags in the example provided by Zak. This means that there will be another commit on this file adding tags. Anyway, maybe the tag's usage need to be discussed more and added to the doc's howto ? >> In the last, and what you did not see/talk about is the correction of >> the errors of syntax in the examples, the corrections of translations. > > The biggest problem of commits of these short is that you make valuable > modifications, and WS fixes in one commit, therefore it is much harder > for translators to identify what needs to be carried over to the > translations. Additionally for those, who are unable to update the > translated docs by every en commit, any WS fix makes life harder, as it > means unneded checks and spares valuable time. Got it, don't worry. >> In short, there was a good side and a bad side in what I did, I've >> understood the bad part and I will avoid it from now. > > I have not said that your commits were all shit. There were good > modifications. It would have been nice if we would only have those. Next time for sure :) >> PS: I will open a swimming pool at home soon ... you're welcome :) > > I don't have one on my own, I share it with the rest of the town where > I live ;) I'm going back to mine =( Mehdi -- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
