On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> Second maintaining some compatibility code in the processing system is
> much easier to handle,
It's just the wrong way to fix it... you're also not patching IE or
Mozilla to make your sites look good in it.
> than giving more hours to work to dozens of translators, just because
> this method seems to be cleaner. Or are you confident, noone really
> cares about the diffs? Then why do we have those translation CVS
> modules??
So you're saying we should keep the English docs a 'mess' because of the
translations? I think that's a pretty weird way of handling this. The
goal is to have a solid, nice, consistant manual; if people want to
translate it: fine, but that should not hold back improvements on the
English manual IMO.
Derick
--
"Interpreting what the GPL actually means is a job best left to those
that read the future by examining animal entrails."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
International PHP Magazine http://php-mag.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
