Hi Mike
I had to do a presentation this morning so just got back to looking at
this. I started thinking about the API approach and thought I would
mock it up with what we have already before making changes. So
repeated the SCA initialization call that happens internally. I had a
HelloWorld test where I moved the service file into a lib directory
and constructd a php file that includes it.
Advertising
<?php
include 'lib/HelloWorld.php';
$_SERVER['SCRIPT_FILENAME'] = 'C:\phpscripts\lib\HelloWorld.php';
SCA::initComponent('C:\phpscripts\lib\HelloWorld.php');
?>
So I'm sure resetting SCRIPT_FILENAME is a dodgy thing to do and I
wouln't recommend it but I just allows me to sidestep the SCA test and
get it running. So we could replace this with some SCA api like
SCA:dispatch("filename");
Where filename is the name of the file/service you want to dispatch
to. Does that sound OK. I would like to make filename servicename
instead but not sure I can do that yet.
Regards
Simon
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"phpsoa" group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
