On 11/17/2010 06:13 PM, Alexander Burger wrote:
> But more important is that this would require quite a mess of code,
> analog to what is there for getting the values of public fields. If you
> look at lines 99 through 142 of "ersatz/fun.src" (actual version), you
> see a lot of tedious type ('instanceof') checks. And they don't even
> cover all possible cases! The same would be required for the opposite
> direction. Or does anybody know a better way?

Is this related to introspection?

// Jakob
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to