re: http://pypyjs.org/demo/
Success: Chrome: 34 Internet Explorer: 11 Failure: Safari: 5 On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Joe Bogner <joebog...@gmail.com> wrote: > It works in chrome too and IE10 too > > Check out: http://pypyjs.org/demo/ > > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Rick Lyman <lyman.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Joe, Christophe, >> >> A downside to asm.js is that it is Firefox only... >> >> >> http://www.infoworld.com/t/javascript/apple-has-its-own-javascript-accelerator-in-the-works-242042 >> >> -rl >> >> p.s.: anyone considering c directly via Chrome/NaCL? >> >> >> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Joe Bogner <joebog...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Rick, Christophe, >>> >>> I was thinking the same thing. miniPicolisp might be a simpler first >>> step to port >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Rick Lyman >>> <lyman.r...@gmail.com<lymanr...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Christophe, >>>> >>>> How about porting the c version using: >>>> https://github.com/kripken/emscripten? >>>> >>>> -rl >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Christophe Gragnic < >>>> christophegrag...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'm currently embedding a «pedagogical pseudo-code like language» in >>>>> PicoLisp. >>>>> As using plain browsers is a nice thing to have in front of students, >>>>> I tried with >>>>> EmuLisp (PicoLisp in JS, by Jon Kleiser, that I won't thank enough, >>>>> with Alex), >>>>> which proved to be a good solution for me. >>>>> >>>>> So I had some thoughts, ideas and questions. >>>>> >>>>> 1) EmuLisp lacks some functions. The first idea I had was to write >>>>> them in the >>>>> available functions (like 'glue' with 'pack'). It worked for some, but >>>>> some others >>>>> needed to be implemented in JS. Now my question: how far could be >>>>> pushed the >>>>> idea to write a maximal subset of Picolisp in a minimal subset of >>>>> Picolisp? Like in >>>>> the original paper of McCarthy or «the Jewel» in SICP? I'm not talking >>>>> about >>>>> performance here, just functions availability. >>>>> >>>>> 2) Since PicoLisp64 is written in a «generic assembly» embedded in >>>>> PicoLisp, >>>>> I was wondering (only wondering, since the concepts are a bit vague >>>>> for me) if >>>>> instead of building the .s files we could build some >>>>> http://asmjs.org/file(s). >>>>> >>>>> 3) Regarding EmuLisp again, and for your information, I've created >>>>> (and am using seriously!) a JS pil, that I named `piljs` which runs on >>>>> node >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
