Hi Jerome, > I am working on a connected watch project running on a very tiny hardware > (MCU running a Cortex ARM 3 from ST microelectronics). I'd like to know if > you have experience running PicoLisp in such environment ? > ... > I have seen that PicoLisp may be too heavyweight in the standard > distribution , the tiny version would be better suited for my needs but I > am really excited by the idea to embed a database into the language.
I think so too. For a really minimalistic system, a modification of miniPicoLisp is a good idea. In contrast to that, the PilMCU is targeted at a more powerful system, being a 64-bit architecture and needing more RAM and persistent storage. If a database is needed, however, miniPicoLisp is not an option. ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=Unsubscribe