Sorry this took awhile Shawn, my machine froze last night while I was 
working on this, and I didn't get back to it till now.

Shawn Walker wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
>   
>> I'm sending out a completely new review request for this wad as I have 
>> changed it significantly since the last webrev I sent out.  The old 
>> versions are still available for comparison.
>>
>> The following webrev includes proposed fixes for the following bugs:
>>
>>    1324 RSS / Atom feeds of repository updates
>>
>> webrev:
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~swalker/pkg-1324-4/
>>     
>
> To be clear, this is the *current* webrev -- all others are original or 
> previous ones.
>
>   
The --proxy-base argument, is that something that could/should be gotten 
from cfg_cache instead of the command line?

Tiny, tiny nits.

misc.py.sdiff.html:
line 320:
I thought we had decided on XB rather than XiB. For consistency, we 
should probably agree as a project. I have no desire to have that 
particular discussion in detail again, so I'll leave it up to someone 
(other than me) to make a decision.

updatelog.py.sdiff.html
lines 427 - 430:
would it be better/faster to just create the dictionary with those three 
entries immediately? Probably doesn't make much of a difference.


That's all the feedback, from what I can tell it looks ,fine, but this 
definitely isn't my area of expertise.

Best of luck,
Brock
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to