[email protected] wrote:
>> Should it just change to x11/tigervnc, then? If we have a package
>> that's a
>> generic interface for a F/OSS component implementation which may
>> change at
>> any point, then the version shouldn't match the F/OSS component, but the
>> interface we're trying to provide.
>
> Since we might have several VNC clients, it seems it should be
> x11/tigervnc (as that matches the upstream name) but with the upstream
> version 1.0.
Since there's two packages should it be x11/tigervnc/vncviewer and
x11/tigervnc/xvnc or x11/tigervnc/vncserver then? (Currently you have
them as x11/vncviewer & x11/server/vnc )
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
