On 02/ 9/10 01:46 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 02/ 9/10 01:31 PM, Rich Burridge wrote:
Hi,
I've looking for a code review for the changes for the following bugs:
6186 OpenSolaris package renaming
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=6186
3393 inconsistent python package naming
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3393
from http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/attachment.cgi?id=3621:
developer/parse/bison:
should be developer/parser/bison
gnome/media/gstreamer:
gstreamer isn't actually a GNOME project, the project changed
sometime ago to "gstreamer: open source multimedia framework". In fact,
KDE apps can use gstreamer as well. So assuming gstreamer only contains
gstreamer, please don't put this under gnome/. media/library/ or
audio/library/ or something else would be better. It doesn't require
GNOME libraries either afaik (Gtk and Glib no longer count as GNOME
libraries either; they're desktop-agnostic and have been for many years).
desktop/pdf-viewer/evince:
So, going with the above point, evince actually *is* a GNOME project.
But I don't know if it actually requires GNOME libraries to run. So
maybe a better question about the gnome/ namespace is what is intended
to live there? It's sort of confusing that we have the gnome/ namespace
and then several packages have gnome in their name that are not in the
gnome/ namespace.
Gnu -> GNU (I think) for package summary:
SNUWgnupg, SUNWpth
print/lp/compatibility/sunos4, system/compatibility/sunos4:
Is it intentional that the the last part of the name isn't unique?
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
