Hi, strong +1
in their own interest .... %martin On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Milan Jurik <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am not on pkg-discuss@ list for some time (and will not be) but after > some discussion today with Shawn Walker I would like to point on > > http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=15022 > > Shawn's oppinion is that it is too wide/generic and suggested to send > this to pkg-discuss@ > > Because I believe performance of packaging system should be tracked and > compared to other packaging system (we can ignore SVR4 partially because > of simplicity of SVR4 if you want, but Red Hat YUM/RPM is on very same > level of features from customer's point of view) I am sending this > e-mail as short info. > > For now after elimination of file system caches and download > deliverables IPS is (at least) 3x slower than YUM/RPM. I am not IPS > internals expert nor others involved on bug submittion so we have no > good possibility to discover the reasons for this performance issue. > > Please, before answering "we have rich set of features so we are > slower", read carefully the comments. > > Best regards, > > Milan > > _______________________________________________ > pkg-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss > _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
