On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Martin Bochnig <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Shawn Walker <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 03/ 5/10 11:34 AM, Martin Bochnig wrote: >>> >>> Come on. >>> The RESULT is what counts. >>> >>> And something is wrong with it. >>> No user is interested in any story about whatever internal reasons for it. >>> You basically say, that the end-user is stupid, if he looks on his >>> stop-watch. >> >> I'm sure you didn't mean that literally, right? >> >> For example, if the result is all that counts (the packages are installed), >> then couldn't you just use a tar archiver to install everything and then run >> a bunch of scripts after that's done? > > > > Hello, where did I say that??? > My definition of "result" referred to the entire complexity of > installation Di-Graphs and the entire nested > interdependency-resolutuion in the shortest possible path! > > But it has to function without hogging the CPU or wasting memory. > > And it cannot harm if the speed is comparable to that of Smart, > Conary, Yum, ... you name it. > This is the "result". > > > > %mab
Anf for the record: I also know the matter. Martin Bochnig Institute of Mathematics Technical University Berlin [email protected] (now live in Ukraine / Germany [if not here, then there {and vice versa}]) >> -- >> Shawn Walker >> > _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
