On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Shawn Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/ 5/10 11:34 AM, Martin Bochnig wrote: >> >> Come on. >> The RESULT is what counts. >> >> And something is wrong with it. >> No user is interested in any story about whatever internal reasons for it. >> You basically say, that the end-user is stupid, if he looks on his >> stop-watch. > > I'm sure you didn't mean that literally, right? > > For example, if the result is all that counts (the packages are installed), > then couldn't you just use a tar archiver to install everything and then run > a bunch of scripts after that's done?
Hello, where did I say that??? My definition of "result" referred to the entire complexity of installation Di-Graphs and the entire nested interdependency-resolutuion in the shortest possible path! But it has to function without hogging the CPU or wasting memory. And it cannot harm if the speed is comparable to that of Smart, Conary, Yum, ... you name it. This is the "result". %mab > > -- > Shawn Walker > _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
