Hi Tim, Thanks for the feedback.
On 07/04/2015 06:38 PM, Tim Rühsen wrote: > Am Freitag, 3. Juli 2015, 22:11:49 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg: >>> * libpsl-dev >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> Filelist libpsl-dev vs. libgmt-dev: >>> >>> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpsl.so >> >> The libpsl & gmt packages use different a SONAME. To ensure dependencies >> on the GMT libpsl it's bundled with libgmt in the libgmt5 package. >> >> To resolve the conflict I'm considering renaming the GMT libpsl to >> libgmt-psl. >> >> I've CC'ed the libpsl maintainers, and I would like to ask your opinion >> on this conflict too. > > IMO, renaming GMT libpsl to libgmt-psl seems reasonable to me. It is a step > towards a cleaner library 'namespacing' regarding GMT. > > If it comes to renaming the non-GMT file (and/or package), I won't be > reluctant. You'll have a good reason than. I'm waiting for feedback from the GMT upstream developers about their opinion on the library rename. For now I think the Conflicts on the -dev package suffices, as long as there are no SONAME bumps in libpsl there is no problem. > BTW, I could not CC this mail to Daniel Kahn Gillmor > <d...@40fifthhorseman.net>, that's why I took him out of the recipient list. I've corrected the email address to make sure Daniel gets a copy. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel